We are searching data for your request:
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
I am learning about the 4 main metabolic pathways for cellular respiration. I learned that NADH and FADH2 hydrogen carriers are essential in the Electron Transport Chain, because they deposit their hydrogens (which consist of protons and electrons), which are used to power ATP synthase (reattaches ADP and Pi together to form ATP) in the inner mitochondrial membrane. The reduced hydrogen carriers must come from glycolysis, pyruvate oxidation, and the Krebs cycle. I'm wondering if all those pathways were inhibited (and essentially broken completely) let's say, is there any possible way for the Electron Transport Chain to get hydrogen so that it can still work?
5.2: Electron Transport and Oxidative Phosphorylation
- Contributed by Kevin Ahern, Indira Rajagopal, & Taralyn Tan
- Professor (Biochemistry and Biophysics) at Oregon State University
In eukaryotic cells, the vast majority of ATP synthesis occurs in the mitochondria in a process called oxidative phosphorylation. Even plants, which generate ATP by photophosphorylation in chloroplasts, contain mitochondria for the synthesis of ATP through oxidative phosphorylation.
Oxidative phosphorylation is linked to a process known as electron transport (Figure 5.14). The electron transport system, located in the inner mitochondrial membrane, transfers electrons donated by the reduced electron carriers NADH and FADH2 (obtained from glycolysis, the citric acid cycle or fatty acid oxidation) through a series of electrons acceptors, to oxygen. As we shall see, movement of electrons through complexes of the electron transport system essentially &ldquocharges&rdquo a battery that is used to make ATP in oxidative phosphorylation. In this way, the oxidation of sugars and fatty acids is coupled to the synthesis of ATP, effectively extracting energy from food.
The electron transport chain has two essential functions in the cell:
- Regeneration of electron carriers: Reduced electron carriers NADH and FADH2 pass their electrons to the chain, turning them back into NAD + and FAD. This function is vital because the oxidized forms are reused in glycolysis and the citric acid cycle (Krebs cycle) during cellular respiration.
- Generating proton gradient: The transport of electron through the chain results in a gradient of a proton across the inner membrane of mitochondria, later used in ATP synthesis.
Part 2: Digestion of carbohydrates
A) Enzymatic breakdown
Amylase is the key enzyme involved in the hydrolysis of large polymeric carbohydrates, such as starch, into smaller units. These large carbohydrates can be broken down into monosaccharides and disaccharides: sugar monomers and their linked products.
Amylase can be found in the saliva as salivary amylase and in the pancreatic secretions as pancreatic amylase. Salivary amylase takes action in the mouth, while pancreatic amylase is secreted into the small intestine.
Disaccharidases then further break down the disaccharides in the duodenum. Maltase, sucrase, and lactase break down maltose, sucrose, and lactose, respectively. Thus, we are left with three monomeric carbohydrates: glucose, galactose, and fructose.
B) Pancreatic regulation
In addition to secreting pancreatic amylase, the pancreas is also responsible for the secretion of three essential hormones. These hormones are manufactured by distinct pancreatic cells, which can be found grouped together in structures called islets of Langerhans.
The islets of Langerhans contain three important types of cells: α-cells, β-cells, and δ-cells.
Glucagon is secreted by α-cells when blood glucose levels are low. This hormone promotes both anabolic and catabolic pathways that increase glucose concentration in the blood, such as glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis.
Insulin is released by β-cells when blood glucose levels are high. It promotes catabolic pathways, such as glycolysis, to derive energy from glucose. It also promotes anabolic pathways, such as glycogenesis, fatty acid synthesis, and peptide synthesis.
Somatostatin is released by δ-cells in response to high blood glucose and amino acid levels. It inhibits the secretion of insulin and glucagon.
For information on additional important roles of the pancreas, refer to our guide on the endocrine system.
C) Glycogenesis and glycogenolysis
Recall that the body stores glucose monomers in the form of glycogen: a large, branching polysaccharide. To form glycogen, glucose monomers are polymerized via glycogenesis. This process occurs through multiple steps:
Each glucose 6-phosphate monomer is converted into glucose 1-phosphate.
A biomolecule known as uridine diphosphate (UDP) is attached to the glucose molecule.
The glucose monomer is either added to a protein called glycogenin to initiate a glycogen chain, or added to a growing glycogen chain by glycogen synthase. Uridine diphosphate is recycled. Glycogen synthase connects glucose monomers linearly using α-1,4 glycosidic linkages.
At certain points,an enzyme known as branching enzyme hydrolyzes one of these linkages. This breaks off an oligosaccharide that the enzyme uses to start a new branch with an α-1,6 glycosidic linkage.
Glycogen is broken back into its glucose monomers via glycogenolysis. Similar to glycogenesis, there are two critical enzymes that will catalyze the reverse reactions of glycogenesis.
An enzyme known as glycogen phosphorylase breaks the α-1,4 glycosidic linkages in a linear chain until it reaches the branching point.
Debranching enzyme hydrolyzes the α-1,4 glycosidic linkage and relocates the resulting oligosaccharide to the end of another linear chain.
Debranching enzyme then hydrolyzes an α-1,6 glycosidic linkage between the branched glucose molecule and the linear chain, resulting in the release of a single glucose monomer.
Figure: Glycogenesis and glycogenolysis.
Organisation of the ETC
Several studies of the organisation of the respiratory complexes have revealed the crucial role of the accessory assembly factors in ETC function and in preventing ROS production resulting from disassembled OXPHOS subunits. 64 The “plasticity model”, proposed by Schägger and Pfeiffer, 65 describes the coexistence of both independent and associated complexes. In particular, complexes I, III and IV (less frequently, complex II) assemble in supercomplexes. 66,67 While complex I is mainly found associated in supercomplexes, 70% of complex III and 15% of complex IV units are associated with supercomplexes. 68 In higher eukaryotes, the most frequent supercomplex, known as the respirasome, is composed of one complex I unit, two complex III units and one complex IV unit (I1III2IV1). 69 Although the mechanism governing the assembly of the respirasome is not well understood, 66,70 there is evidence that complexes III and IV are able to form autonomously, while mature complex I exists only in the respirasome 71 and affects its correct assembly. Several studies showed that mitochondrial disorders that reduce the abundance of complex III or IV are often combined with an impairment in complex I expression. 72,73,74,75 Supercomplex assembly optimises the structural proximity of UbQ with complexes I and III 76 and the channelling of electrons to UbQ and cytochrome c, thus enhancing the efficiency of electron transfer among the complexes and reducing ROS generation.
However, mitochondrial remodelling during apoptosis or in hypoxia-induced acidification of the mitochondrial matrix impairs the assembly of supercomplexes. 77,78 Supercomplex assembly is also connected to OMA1-dependent remodelling of the mitochondrial cristae. 79 The plasticity of ETC organisation can also fine-tune the production of ROS, and consequently, the activity of ROS-sensitive pathways, 80 and influences the adaptation of cancer cells to hypoxia.
The balance between supercomplexes and free complexes can influence cellular metabolism. Although assembly of complex I in supercomplexes promotes electron transport through NADH derived from glucose metabolism, free complex I favours electron transport through FAD-linked pathways 81 (see below). Indeed, by switching the ETC organisation between free complexes and supercomplexes, cancer cells can tailor their metabolism to different microenvironment conditions.
In several cancer types, loss of supercomplex organisation may favour a metabolic switch towards the Warburg effect phenotype. 82 Consistent with the central role of complex I in respirasome assembly, cancer cells with mutations in ND2 exhibit a glycolytic metabolic profile interestingly, these cancer cells also exhibited increased metastatic potential. 30 In addition, the downregulation of NDUFS1, another complex I subunit, is selected by antiangiogenic therapy in ovarian cancer, leading to a stable glycolytic phenotype and increased aggressiveness. 83
Although increased ROS levels and metabolic rewiring caused by the loss of supercomplex organisation promote tumorigenesis, some evidence suggests that supercomplex assembly could also be enhanced by oncogenes, thus limiting ROS generation by the ETC. For instance, it has been reported that HER2 can translocate to the inner side of the IMM, 84 where it could promote increased assembly of supercomplexes. Interestingly, Rohlenova et al. 85 observed that mitochondrial-targeted tamoxifen (MitoTam), which disrupts supercomplex assembly, impairs electron flow from complex I to complex III, thus increasing ROS generation and cell death in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cells. It is noteworthy that as the electron flow from FAD-linked enzymes to complex III is not affected by MitoTam treatment, hypoxic adaptation could protect cancer cells from its cytotoxic effect. In addition, KRAS contributes to protect against ROS overload through its involvement in the biosynthetic pathway of cardiolipin (see below), an IMM-specific phospholipid. Cardiolipin is sequestered by supercomplexes, being protected from degradation, and in turn, stabilises supercomplexes, thus decreasing the electron leakage. 86
The study of metabolic pathways
There are two main reasons for studying a metabolic pathway: (1) to describe, in quantitative terms, the chemical changes catalyzed by the component enzymes of the route and (2) to describe the various intracellular controls that govern the rate at which the pathway functions.
Studies with whole organisms or organs can provide information that one substance is converted to another and that this process is localized in a certain tissue for example, experiments can show that urea, the chief nitrogen-containing end product of protein metabolism in mammals, is formed exclusively in the liver. They cannot reveal, however, the details of the enzymatic steps involved. Clues to the identity of the products involved, and to the possible chemical changes effected by component enzymes, can be provided in any of four ways involving studies with either whole organisms or tissues.
First, under stress or the imbalances associated with diseases, certain metabolites may accumulate to a greater extent than normal. Thus, during the stress of intense exercise, lactic acid appears in the blood, while glycogen, the form in which carbohydrate is stored in muscle, disappears. Such observations do not, however, prove that lactic acid is a normal intermediate of glycogen catabolism rather, they show only that compounds capable of yielding lactic acid are likely to be normal intermediates. Indeed, in the example, lactic acid is formed in response to abnormal circumstances and is not directly formed in the pathways of carbohydrate catabolism.
Second, the administration of metabolic poisons may lead to the accumulation of specific metabolites. If fluoroacetic acid or fluorocitric acid is ingested by animals, for example, citric acid accumulates in the liver. This correctly suggests that fluorocitric acid administered as such, or formed from fluoroacetic acid via the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle, inhibits an enzyme of citrate oxidation.
Third, the fate of any nutrient—indeed, often the fate of a particular chemical group or atom in a nutrient—can be followed with relative ease by administering the nutrient labeled with an isotope. Isotopes are forms of an element that are chemically indistinguishable from each other but differ in physical properties.
The use of a nonradioactive isotope of nitrogen in the 1930s first revealed the dynamic state of body constituents. It had previously been believed that the proteins of tissues are stable once formed, disappearing only with the death of the cell. By feeding amino acids labeled with isotopic nitrogen to rats, it was discovered that the isotope was incorporated into many of the amino acids found in proteins of the liver and the gut, even though the total protein content of these tissues did not change. This suggested that the proteins of these tissues exist in a dynamic steady state, in which relatively high rates of synthesis are counterbalanced by equal rates of degradation. Thus, although the average liver cell has a life-span of several months, half of its proteins are synthesized and degraded every five to six days. On the other hand, the proteins of the muscle or the brain, tissues that (unlike the gut or liver) need not adjust to changes in the chemical composition of their milieu, do not turn over as rapidly. The high rates of turnover observed in liver and gut tissues indicate that the coarse controls, exerted through the onset and cessation of synthesis of pacemaker enzymes, do occur in animal cells.
Finally, genetically altered organisms ( mutants) fail to synthesize certain enzymes in an active form. Such defects, if not lethal, result in the accumulation and excretion of the substrate of the defective enzyme in normal organisms, the substrate would not accumulate, because it would be acted upon by the enzyme. The significance of this observation was first realized in the early 20th century when the phrase “inborn errors of metabolism” was used to describe hereditary conditions in which a variety of amino acids and other metabolites are excreted in the urine. In microorganisms, in which it is relatively easy to cause genetic mutations and to select specific mutants, this technique has been very useful. In addition to their utility in the unraveling of metabolic pathways, the use of mutants in the early 1940s led to the postulation of the one gene-one enzyme hypothesis by the Nobel Prize winners George W. Beadle and Edward L. Tatum their discoveries opened the field of biochemical genetics and first revealed the nature of the fine controls of metabolism.
Because detailed information about the mechanisms of component enzymatic steps in any metabolic pathway cannot be obtained from studies with whole organisms or tissues, various techniques have been developed for studying these processes—e.g., sliced tissues, and homogenates and cell-free extracts, which are produced by physical disruption of the cells and the removal of cell walls and other debris. The sliced-tissue technique was successfully used by the Nobel Prize winner Sir Hans Krebs in his pioneer studies in the early 1930s on the mechanism of urea formation in the liver. Measurements were made of the stimulating effects of small quantities of amino acids on both the rate of oxygen uptake and the amount of oxygen taken up the amino acids were added to liver slices bathed in a nutrient medium. Such measurements revealed the cyclic nature of the process specific amino acids acted as catalysts, stimulating respiration to an extent greater than expected from the quantities added. This was because the added material had been re-formed in the course of the cycle (see below Disposal of nitrogen).
Homogenates of tissue are useful in studying metabolic processes because permeability barriers that may prevent ready access of external materials to cell components are destroyed. The tissue is usually minced, blended, or otherwise disrupted in a medium that is suitably buffered to maintain the normal acid–base balance of the tissue, and contains the ions required for many life processes, chiefly sodium, potassium, and magnesium. The tissue is either used directly—as was done by Krebs in elucidating, in 1937, the TCA cycle from studies of the respiration of minced pigeon breast muscle—or fractionated (i.e., broken down) further. If the latter procedure is followed, homogenization is often carried out in a medium containing a high concentration of the sugar sucrose, which provides a milieu favourable for maintaining the integrity of cellular components. The components are recovered by careful spinning in a centrifuge, at a series of increasing speeds. It is thus possible to obtain fractions containing predominantly one type of organelle: nuclei (and some unbroken cells) mitochondria, lysosomes, and microbodies microsomes (i.e., ribosomes and endoplasmic reticulum fragments) and—after prolonged centrifugation at forces in excess of 100,000 times gravity—a clear liquid that represents the soluble fraction of the cytoplasm. The fractions thus obtained can be further purified and tested for their capacity to carry out a given metabolic step or steps. This procedure was used to show that isolated mitochondria catalyze the oxidation reactions of the TCA cycle and that these organelles also contain the enzymes of fatty acid oxidation. Similarly, isolated ribosomes are used to study the pathway and mechanism of protein synthesis.
The final step in elucidating a reaction in a metabolic pathway includes isolation of the enzyme involved. The rate of the reaction and the factors that control the activity of the enzyme are then measured.
It should be emphasized that biochemists realize that studies on isolated and highly purified systems, such as those briefly described above, can do no more than approximate biological reality. The identification of the fine and coarse controls of a metabolic pathway, and (when appropriate) other influences on that pathway, must ultimately involve the study of the pathway in the whole cell or organism. Although some techniques have proved adequate for relating findings in the test tube to the situation in living organisms, study of the more complex metabolic processes, such as those involved in differentiation and development, may require the elaboration of new experimental approaches.
Electron transport chains are the source of energy for all known forms of life. They are redox reactions that transfer electrons from an electron donor to an electron acceptor. The transfer of electrons is coupled to the translocation of protons across a membrane, producing a proton gradient. The proton gradient is used to produce useful work.
The coupling of thermodynamically favorable to thermodynamically unfavorable biochemical reactions by biological macromolecules is an example of an emergent property – a property that could not have been predicted, even given full knowledge of the primitive geochemical systems from which these macromolecules evolved. It is an open question whether such emergent properties evolve only by chance, or whether they necessarily evolve in any large biogeochemical system, given the underlying laws of physics.
Mitochondrial electron transport chain, ROS generation and uncoupling (Review)
Copyright: © Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License [CC BY_NC 4.0].
This article is mentioned in:
The chemiosmotic theory proposed by Peter Mitchell (1) in 1961 states that the transfer of electrons derived from substrate oxidation and ATP synthesis are coupled in the mitochondrial ETC, but that does not mean that the transfer of electrons is 100% efficient. Due to the existence of electron leak and proton leak, not all electrons in the ETC can be transferred to the final electron acceptor O 2 and the energy released by the transferred electrons cannot be completely coupled with ATP generation. However, both the ROS generated by electron leak and the UCPs implicated in proton leak play an important role in the physiology and pathology of cells. Therefore, it is extremely important to understand the process of electron transfer in the ETC and the mechanism of electron leak and proton leak.
In this review, the basic components of the ETC are discussed and the process of electron transfer in each complex, including the structure, composition and function of each complex is reviewed. In addition, the ROS generation sites in the ETC are summarized and the ROS regulation is mentioned. Moreover, proton leak is emphatically introduced, including the structure, tissue distribution, functions and regulatory factors of UCPs. The diseases implicated in ROS or UCPs are simply summarized.
2. Mitochondrial ETC and ATP synthase
The ETC, which is composed of transmembrane protein complexes (I-IV) and the freely mobile electron transfer carriers ubiquinone and cytochrome c, exists in the folded inner membranes called cristae (Fig. 1). The complexes must be assembled into a specifically configured supercomplex to function properly (2,3). These assembled components together with F 1 F 0 ATP synthase (namely, complex V) become the basis of ATP production during oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). To better understand the whole process of how electron transportation produces ATP via the ETC, it is necessary to know the ultrastructure and function of the individual complexes.
Generation of electron leaks and proton leaks in the electron transport chain. Electrons derived from oxidizable substrates are passed through CI/III/IV or CII/III/IV in an exergonic process that drives the proton pumping into the IMS of CI, CIII and CIV. The energy of the proton gradient drives the ATP synthesis of CV or can be consumed by UCPs. The sites of superoxide production in each complex are also indicated, including sites IF and IQ in CI, sites IIF in CII and site IIIQo in CIII. The O -2 released into the IMS by site IIIQo can be converted into H2O2 in a reaction catalyzed by superoxide dismutase 1 and H2O2 then may diffuse into the cytoplasm. The red arrows indicate electron pathways. The black arrows represent substrate reactions. The blue arrows show the proton circuit across the IMM. In cyan, the complexes I-V are marked as I, II, III, IV, V, respectively. Q, ubiquinone C, cytochrome c IMM, inner mitochondrial membrane IMS, intermembrane space OMM, outer mitochondrial membrane UCP, uncoupling protein.
Complex I (CI)
CI, also called NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase, is the largest multisubunit enzyme complex in the ETC. The key role of CI is to transfer electrons from matrix NADH to ubiquinone, as the name implies. A number of studies have reported the structure of the bacterial mitochondrial CI using X-ray crystallography at a nearly atomic resolution (4,5). Mitochondria from the Bos taurus heart have been regarded as the best model for human CI (6-9). These studies demonstrate that the L-shaped eukaryotic CI contains two domains: The membrane arm embedded in the inner membranes and the matrix arm protruding into the matrix. The two domains are mainly composed of 14 core subunits that are conserved from bacterial CI and are the core of the enzymatic reaction. There are 45 clearly identified proteins that participate in the formation of the core subunits. The matrix arm contains seven core subunits (NDUFS1, NDUFS2, NDUFS3, NDUFS7, NDUFS8, NDUFV1 and NDUFV 2) that contain the following cofac-tors: A flavin mononucleotide (FMN) molecule 7-9 FeS clusters [including the (2Fe-2S) N1b , (4Fe-4S) N3 , (4Fe-4S) N4 , (4Fe-4S) N5 , (4Fe-4S) N6a/b and (4Fe-4S) N2 clusters] (4,10) and the final electron accepting iron-sulfur cluster (N2 cluster), which was recently found to deliver electrons to ubiquinone binding sites (11). The membrane arm contains seven hydrophobic subunits (ND1-6 and ND4L), all of which are encoded by the mitochondrial genome. In addition, a large number of accessory subunits are arranged around the core subunits. The assembly of these modules has been reviewed in detail elsewhere (12). An FMN bound at the cusp of the matrix arm could form FMNH 2 by accepting a pair of electrons derived from matrix NADH, which is primarily produced by the tricarbox-ylic acid (Krebs) cycle that continuously occurs in the matrix. These interactions also mean that electrons go into the ETC and are then passed to ubiquinone via a chain of iron-sulfur clusters arranged from low to high potential [the transfer order was reported as FMN→N3→N1b→N4→N5→N6a→N6b→ N2 (4)]. The ubiquinone binding site is located at the junction of the membrane arm and matrix arm, in which ubiquinone (CoQ) is reduced to ubiquinol (QH 2 ). Then, the conformational changes of the N2 cluster induce the formation of a proton translocation channel by the ND1, ND3, ND6 and ND4L subunits near the CoQ binding site (13). The energy released by the transfer of a pair of electrons from NADH to CoQ in CI probably (not definitively) induce the pumping of four protons from the matrix into the intermembrane space (14-17). Several hypotheses exist in current research: Ohnishi (18) proposed a hypothesis that two protons are indirectly pumped out in a conformation-coupled manner and that the other two protons are directly pumped out by the induction of ubiquinone redox. Sazanov and Hinchliffe (4) hypothesized that three protons are indirectly pumped via three antiporter homologs, and the final proton is shifted in an unclear way. In addition, Tan et al (14) speculated that the conformation changes and the density of water molecules in the trans-membrane domain determine the proton translocation in CI. However, how the energy transfers from the redox reaction to proton translocation are still unknown.
Complex II (CII)
CII, namely, succinate dehydrogenase, is a component of the Krebs cycle as well as the ETC, serving as a link between metabolism and OXPHOS (19,20). As a part of the Krebs cycle, CII catalyzes the oxidation of succinate to fumarate. CII is another entry point for electrons and donates them from succinate to CoQ via FeS clusters, similar to CI. CII consists of four subunits (20). A total of two of the subunits, the membrane-anchor proteins CybL and CybS, are hydrophobic, anchor the complex to the inner membrane, and contain the CoQ binding site. The other two subunits are located on the matrix side of the inner membrane and contain the binding site of the substrate succinate, three FeS clusters [(2Fe-2S), (4Fe-4S) and (3Fe-4S)], and a flavoprotein covalently bound to a FAD cofactor. The assembly steps of the four subunits are detailed elsewhere (21). FAD is reduced to FADH 2 after receiving electrons from succinate and then transfers the electrons to FeS clusters. Then, CoQ is reduced to QH 2 after obtaining the electrons from the FeS cluster (3Fe-4S) (22). Electron transport in CII is not accompanied by the translocation of protons.
Complex III (CIII)
CIII is commonly referred to as a cytochrome bc l complex, or CoQ-cytochrome c reductase and transfers the electrons carried by QH 2 to cytochrome c. CIII is a symmetrical dimer with 11 subunits per monomer (23). The catalytically active subunits are cytochrome b (b L and b H ), cytochrome c 1 and a high-potential (2Fe-2S) cluster wrapped by an iron-sulphur protein (24). There are two CoQ binding sites on both ends of cytochrome b embedded in the inner membrane of the mitochondria, one of which is the QH 2 oxidation site (Q o ) located at the cytoplasmic side, which is related to the low potential cytochrome b L . The other is the Q - reduction site (Q i ) on the side of the matrix, which is related to the high potential cytochrome b H (25). The electron transfer process of CIII is accomplished by the Q-cycle (24-27). QH 2 is oxidized to ubisemiquinone (QH - ) after transferring an electron to the (2Fe-2S) cluster and two protons are concurrently released into the mitochondrial intermembrane space (IMS) from the matrix (28). The (2Fe-2S) cluster transfers this electron to cytochrome c 1 , from which it is transferred to cytochrome c, a mobile electron carrier. Then, the highly reductive QH − formed at the Q o site rapidly transfers the second electron to cytochrome b L , which in turn transfers it to cytochrome b H at the Q i site. Reduced cytochrome b H transfers this electron to the CoQ of the Q i site, forming a QH − . To complete the Q-cycle, the second QH 2 molecule is oxidized at the Q o site while displacing the other two protons. Similarly, one electron is transferred to the (2Fe-2S) cluster and the other electron to cytochrome b H and finally to QH − of the Qi site to produce QH 2 .
Complex IV (CIV)
CIV, also known as cytochrome c oxidase, transfers electrons from cytochrome c to the terminal electron acceptor O 2 to generate H 2 O. Mammalian CIV consists of 13 different subunits containing four redox-active metal centers, namely, Cu A , heme a (Fe a ) and a binuclear center composed of heme a 3 (Fe a3 ) and Cu B (29,30). Subunits I, II, III are encoded by mitochondrial DNA and are the core subunits, while the 10 nuclear-coded subunits are the accessory subunits (31,32). Subunit I contains three of the four cofactors, heme a and the binuclear center, which transfers electrons from heme a to O 2 (29). Subunits II and III are located on both sides of subunit I and there are two Cu A cofactors on the side of the intermembrane space of subunit II. Subunit III stabilizes the other two core proteins and is mainly involved in proton pumping (33,34). The nuclear-coded subunits participate in the modulation of physiological activity via the allosteric ATP-mediated inhibition of CIV, which depends on the ATP/ADP-ratio (35-39).
Cytochrome c, similar to CoQ, is a mobile electron carrier that is loosely connected to the outer surface of the inner mitochondrial membrane by electrostatic interactions, allowing it to interact with the cytochrome c 1 of CIII and to accept electrons (39). The reduced cytochrome c moves along the surface of the membrane and interacts with subunit II of CIV by electrostatic interactions, simultaneously transmitting electrons to the Cu A site of subunit II, and then the electrons are passed from heme a to the binuclear center of subunit I (29,39), where the O 2 is reduced to H 2 O. A total of four electrons at a time from cytochrome c are almost simultaneously transferred to bind dioxygen eight protons in total are removed from the matrix, of which half are used to form the two water molecules and the other four are pumped across the membrane into the IMS (40).
Complex V (CV)
CV is normally called F 1 F 0 ATP synthase and consists of two functional domains: F 0 and F 1 . The F 0 domain, located in the inner mitochondrial membrane, contains a subunit c-ring, including one of each of the subunits a, b, d, F6 and oligomycin sensitivity-conferring protein (OSCP) as well as the accessory subunits e, f, g and A6L (41,42). The subunits b, d, F6 and OSCP form the peripheral stalk, which is located on one side of the complex. A number of additional subunits (e, f, g and A6L), which all span the membrane, are associated with the c-ring subunit. The F 1 domain, situated in the mitochondrial matrix, consists of soluble subunits: Three α subunits, three β subunits and one of each of the γ, δ and ε subunits (42,43). The three α and three β subunits make up the catalytic head of F 1 , and the γ, δ and ε subunits constitute the central stalk that connects the F 1 head and F 0 subunit c-ring (41,43,44). The ETC transfers two electrons at a time to monooxygen to generate one H 2 O molecule, which is accompanied by the pumping of four, four and two protons from the matrix to the IMS through CI, CIII, and CIV, respectively (or zero, four and two protons through the CII, CIII, and CIV, respectively). Then, the protons pass from the IMS to the matrix through F 0 , which transfers the stored energy created by the proton electrochemical gradient to F 1 , causing a conformational change in F 1 F 0 ATP synthase so that ADP can be phosphorylated to form ATP (41).
In conclusion, the entire composition of each individual complex has been well described over the past century and it is now widely accepted that these complexes must establish interactions and form supercomplexes to perform their function. Due to the application of cryo-electron microscopy, a greater understanding of the high-resolution structure of these complexes has been gained (45-47).
3. ROS generation in the ETC
The sites of ROS production in the ETC
Mitochondria are a main source of cellular ROS. Under physiological conditions, 0.2-2% of the electrons in the ETC do not follow the normal transfer order but instead directly leak out of the ETC and interact with oxygen to produce superoxide or hydrogen peroxide (48,49). A total of 11 sites that produce superoxide (O 2 − ) and/or hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2 ) that are associated with substrate oxidation and the ETC have currently been identified in mammalian mitochondria (50). Sites O F , P F , B F and A F are in the 2-oxoacid dehydrogenase complexes, sites I F and I Q are in CI, site III Qo is in CIII, and sites II F , G Q , E F and D Q are linked to the Q-dependent dehydrogenases in the QH 2 /Q pool (50). The occurrence of numerous diseases and hypoxia are closely related to the increase of ROS production. CI and CIII, especially CI, are considered to be the main sites of ROS production in mitochondria (51,52).
ROS can be generated in the matrix at both site I F (FMN site) and site I Q (CoQ binding site) during the transfer of electrons from NADH to CoQ in CI (Fig. 1). Rotenone and piericidin are site I Q inhibitors that interrupt the electron transfer to CoQ and increase ROS production at site I F . Hernansanz-Agustin et al (53) found that acute hypoxia produces a superoxide burst during the first few minutes in arterial endothelial cells and CI mainly participated in this process.
CII produces ROS at site II F (Fig. 1), which is associated with succinate dehydrogenase. The level of ROS produced by site II F under normal conditions is negligible, but the increases in ROS observed in CII mutation-related diseases are mainly derived from site II F (54,55). The study of isolated mitochondria from rat skeletal muscle also indicated that the maximum capacity for ROS production of site II F is very high, exceeded only by site III Qo and perhaps site I Q (50,56). The capacity of site II F to produce ROS is closely related to the quantity of reduced flavoprotein, whose FAD is a potent site of electron leakage to generate ROS. ROS are exclusively produced in the matrix, because the flavoprotein is located on the matrix side of the inner mitochondrial membrane (56). In addition, any contribution by site II F can be dampened by the occupation of the CII flavoprotein site by dicarboxylic acids, particularly oxaloacetate, malate and succinate, which blocks the access of oxygen to site II F , where it would form ROS (21,57).
CIII produces small amounts of ROS, which could be overlooked compared to the ROS production of CI (52). CIII transfers electrons through the Q-cycle. In this process, ubisemiquinone (QH − ) of the Q o site carrying a single electron can move freely in CIII, directly leaking the single electron to O 2 , forming ROS through a nonenzymatic reaction (58,59). The formed ROS can be released into both the matrix and IMS despite the location of the Q o site on the IMS side of the inner mitochondrial membrane. Muller et al (60) built two models explaining how superoxide can reach the matrix. The O 2 − released into the IMS can be converted to the relatively more stable form of H 2 O 2 by superoxide dismutase (SOD) enzymes (Fig. 1). This permanent and stable oxidant molecule, which freely disperses through the outer membrane of mitochondria, acts as an intracellular signaling molecule, physiologically functioning via the direct modification of amino acids (61). However, supporting evidence demonstrates that O 2 − can permeate through the mitochondrial membrane into the cytosol through anion channels (62). Treberg et al (63) experiments in the mitochondria of wild-type rat skeletal muscle proved that
63% of ROS are produced in the matrix. Antimycin A can specifically block the Q i site of CIII, resulting in the stalling of electrons on the QH - at site III Qo , which could react with O 2 to generate ROS (64,65). As specific inhibitors of the Q o site, stigmatellin and myxothiazol can block the binding of QH 2 to the Q o site, which also blocks the transfer of electrons into CIII, thereby preventing the production of ROS in CIII (64). Previously, a chemical suppressor of site III Qo electron leak called S3QELs was screened and found to specifically suppress the ROS formation at site III Qo without affecting electron transport or the redox states of other centers (66).
CIV is less prone to produce ROS when O 2 is bound to Fe a3 2+ or when O 2 is negatively polarized (O 2 − ) and expected to undergo a structural change. This structural change allows O 2 − to receive three electron equivalents from Cu B 1 + , Fe a3 3 + and the hydroxyl group of Tyr244 (Tyr-OH) in no particular order, providing the complete reduction of O 2 and minimizing the production of ROS (67). It is important to note that the binu-clear center structure of CIV is crucial for the nonsequential transfer of the three electron equivalents (39,67).
ROS as signaling molecules in physiological or patho- logical conditions
In the past, it was believed that ROS were exclusively harmful to cells. However, recent studies have demonstrated that ROS appear to be very important second messengers that mediate different intracellular pathways (50,61,68). ROS act through the oxidative modification of numerous types of proteins, particularly receptors, kinases, phosphatases, caspases, ion channels and transcription factors (68). The ROS produced from CIII are necessary for HIF-1α stabilization and consequently, for the proliferation of cells, including vascular smooth muscle cells, endothelial cells and erythroid progenitors (69). There is ample evidence that ROS are also involved in different protein kinase signaling cascades, such as the protein kinase B (AKT), AMP-activate protein kinase (AMPK) and mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase/mitogen-activated protein kinase 8 pathways, changing the fate of cells between autophagy and apoptosis [(Table I and (70)]. Under hypoxic conditions, ROS activate AMPK, which can upregulate cytoprotective autophagy by inhibiting downstream mammalian target of rapamycin activity (71). ROS have also been demonstrated to regulate synaptic plasticity-related signalling molecules, receptors and channels, including N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (72), Ca 2+ channel (73,74), Ca 2+ kinase II (CaMKII) (75), extracellular signal-regulated kinase (76) and cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) response element binding protein (CREB) (74,77). ROS are also necessary for long-term potentiation, a phenomenon of synaptic plasticity widely regarded as one of the main molecular mechanisms that form the basis of learning and memory (77,78). Physiological levels of ROS can promote the establishment of neuronal polarity and regulate neuronal cytoskeletal organization and dynamics by regulating intracellular Ca 2+ release (79-81).
The signaling pathways involved in the different cell fates in which the mitochondrial production of ROS has been implicated.
The signaling pathways involved in the different cell fates in which the mitochondrial production of ROS has been implicated.
|Cell fates||Signaling pathways||(Refs.)|
|Apoptosis||i) Death receptor pathway: ROS-Death receptors (FasL, TNF-α, TRAIL)-Caspase-8-Caspase-3 |
ii) Mitochondrial pathway: ROS-Apoptosome complex (cytochrome c, Apaf-1 and dATP)-Caspase-9-Caspase-3
iii) ROS-ASK1-JNK-Death receptor pathway/Mitochondrial pathway
|Autophagy||i) ROS-FOXO3-LC3/BNIP3-Autophagy |
vi) ROS-AMPK-ULK1 complex-Autophagy
|Necrosis||i) ROS-death receptors (TNF-α)-RIPK1-Necrosome (RIPK3 and MLKL) |
ii) ROS-PARP1-Necrosome (RIPK3 and MLKL)
iii) ROS-p53-Bax-MPTP opening-Necrosis
|Pyroptosis||i) ROS-MAPK-ERK1/2-NLRP3 inflammasome |
ii) ROS-TXNIP-NLRP3 inflammasome
[i] ROS, reactive oxygen species ERK, extracellular signal regulated kinase MAPK, mitogen associate protein kinase HIF, hypoxia inducible factor AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase TNF, tumor necrosis factor MPTP, mitochondrial permeability transition pore NLRP3, NACHT, LRR and PYD domains-containing protein 3 RIPK1, receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 3 MLKL, mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein.
The amount of ROS generated as a result of a stimulus determines whether ROS play beneficial or harmful roles, which means different physiological or pathological pathways are activated. A large amount of ROS cause lipid peroxidation, DNA damage, protein oxidation, irreversible impairment of mitochondria, insufficient ATP generation and, eventually, cell death (82). The ROS-mediated activation of NHE-1 is implicated in cardiac hypertrophy (83). In addition, the activation of CaMKII by ROS contributes to an increase in cardiomyocyte death and the development of heart failure (84). ROS are involved in a number of chronic inflammatory diseases, particularly atherogenesis, through activating the NF-κB pathway (85). In addition, it is widely known that the ROS burst during reperfusion plays a critical role in ischemia-reperfusion injury (86). Table II summarizes the pathologies in which ROS has been implicated.
The pathologies in which the mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species has been implicated.
The pathologies in which the mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species has been implicated.
|Non-alcoholic liver disease||(121,122)|
|Age-related macular degeneration||(129,130)|
|Duchenne muscular dystrophy||(134,135)|
[i] COPD, chronic pulmonary obstructive disorder HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.
4. Mitochondrial proton leak
The overview of proton leak
OXPHOS is not completely coupled. Under routine circumstances, a small number of protons do not pass through ATP synthase and instead flow directly into the mitochondrial matrix across the inner mitochondrial membrane, without the generation of ATP, in a process known as proton leak. In the concept of 'respiratory state' proposed by Chance and Williams (16), mitochondrial respiration persists in the absence of ADP (state 4) and reflects the oxygen consumption of proton leak. The existence of proton leak can also be proven by the collapse of the proton gradient (Δp) in the presence of the ATP synthase inhibitor oligomycin in isolated mitochondria (137).
It was found that the proton leak of the inner mitochondrial membrane demonstrated nonohmic conductivity (137). According to Ohm's Law (R=U/I), the resistance of a conductor is fixed and the electric current increases linearly with increasing voltage. However, the rate of proton leak increases exponentially with increasing ΔΨ. That is, the proton conductivity increases when ΔΨ is high. The existence of nonohmic conductivity indicates that there is a bidirectional self-regulatory mechanism between electron transport and proton re-entry: Protons are pumped out of the matrix into the IMS driven by the electron transport in CI, CIII, CIV, and ΔΨ is gradually elevated. On one hand, the elevated ΔΨ inhibits the transfer of electrons to further elevate ΔΨ, through which the inner membrane is protected from electric shock and maintains suitable ΔΨ. On the other hand, the exorbitant ΔΨ can cause the increase in proton leak to decrease.
Proton leak consists of two parts: Basal proton leak and inducible proton leak. Basal proton leakage is not regulated and is related to the lipid bilayer of the inner mitochondrial membrane and the adenine nucleotide translocase (ANT). Induced proton leak is precisely regulated and can be catalyzed or suppressed by uncoupling proteins (UCPs) and ANT.
Basal proton leak has an important relationship with the basal metabolic rate (BMR) in mammals at rest. The lower the BMR of a species, the weaker the basal proton conductance. Studies have demonstrated that the extent of basal proton leak among species has a phylogenetic relationship (138,139). Although the lipid bilayer can significantly increase proton conductivity, only
5% of basal proton leak is mediated by lipid bilayers (140) and most of the basic proton leak is correlated with ANT (141). UCP1, which is abundant in brown adipose tissue (BAT), may also be involved in basal proton leak (142), although there remains controversy (143). In particular, proton leak through ANT or UCP1 is independent of protein activity, as proton leak still occurs in the presence of the ANT inhibitor carboxyatractylate and the UCP1 inhibitor GDP (141,144).
The majority of the induced proton leak is catalyzed by UCPs. UCPs belong to the family of mitochondrial anion carrier proteins, through which the protons can reflux into the matrix. To date, five UCPs have been identified in mammals, UCP1, UCP2, UCP3, UCP4 and UCP5, and all are present in the form of dimers in the inner mitochondrial membrane (145). These UCPs have a purine nucleotide binding site located on a projection in the IMS (146). The purine nucleotides (ATP, ADP, GTP and GDP) are inhibitors of UCP-mediated proton flux, whereas ROS and fatty acids are activators (147,148). In addition to the role of uncoupling, UCPs may also participate in other processes, such as the regulation of calcium homeostasis, ion transportation or synaptic plasticity (149,150).
UCP1 is mainly expressed in BAT, which converts stored energy in Δp into heat for thermogenesis (151). UCP1 can also be detected in the beige adipocytes of white adipose tissue (WAT) during thermal acclimation under specific conditions (152). The genetic deletion of UCP1 severely inhibits cold adaptive thermogenesis and diet-induced adrenergic thermogenesis, and UCP1-null mice develop fatal hypothermia upon cold exposure (153,154). Interestingly, WAT can exert nonshivering thermogenesis with a UCP1-independent pathway (155,156). UCP1 has also been found in thymocytes and demonstrated to be involved in the maturation and fate determination of developing T-cells (157-159). Sale et al (160) found that UCP1 is expressed in islets and associates with the acute insulin response to glucose.
UCP1-catalyzed proton leak could be activated by long chain free fatty acids and inhibited by purine nucleotides (161). Acute cold or overfeeding stimuli induce the release of norepinephrine by sympathetic nerves and then induce cAMP-responsive pathways through β3-adrenergic receptors on brown adipocytes, which could further promote the transcription of UCP1 and lipolysis for more free fatty acids (162). There are currently three models for the regulated mechanism of UCP1-implicated proton leak (162-169).
UCP2 and UCP3, paralogues of UCP1, exhibit
60% sequence identity with UCP1 and
70% identity with each other (170,171). UCP2 is rather ubiquitous, expressed in WAT, BAT, macrophages, erythroid cells, thymocytes and pancreatic β-cells as well as heart, brain, lung, kidney and lymphocytes (172-176). The UCP3 gene is mainly expressed in skeletal muscle, BAT and heart (177,178) and has also been detected in the thymus, spleen (179) and skin cells (180). Studies with UCP2/3-ablated mice have demonstrated that UCP2 and UCP3 are not implicated in adaptive thermogenesis or the regulation of body weight (170,181). However, the role of UCP2 and UCP3 in inhibiting the production of ROS in mitochondria by reducing ΔΨ is widely accepted (182). A strong correlation between ROS production and mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨ) has already been confirmed (183). Experiments have demonstrated that ROS production is increased in UCP2/3-ablated mice (184-186). ROS-induced lipid hydroperoxides such as hydroxynonenal can activate UCP2/3-mediated proton leak, but the mechanism remains uncertain (178). By reducing ΔΨ, the transfer of electrons in the ETC can be accelerated and the likelihood of electrons being directly transferred to O 2 can be minimized. Therefore, mild uncoupling is a feedback mechanism adopted by the body to prevent excessive ROS in the mitochondria, which was termed 'uncoupling to survive' (187). However, whether UCP1 is implicated in the regulation of ROS in BAT is still controversial (175,188,189). In addition to the function of reducing the generation of ROS, UCP3 has been demonstrated to be involved in exporting mitochondrial fatty acid anions to the cytoplasm, thereby protecting the mitochondrial against lipid peroxide-induced damage (190,191).
UCP4 and UCP5 (also called brain mitochondrial carrier protein 1), which have 30% homology to UCP1 (192), are primarily expressed in the central nervous system of mammals (193,194). Although UCP4 and UCP5 are more widely distributed in the brain than UCP2, less is known about their function. UCP4 was first detected in the brain, but it has recently been found in adipocytes (195). In addition, UCP4 also plays a predominant role in insect mitochondria (196). On the other hand, UCP5, which is not limited to the brain, is also expressed in the testis, uterus, kidney, lung, stomach, liver and heart (149). It has been demonstrated that neuronal UCP4 and UCP5 share similar conformational and proton transport activities with UCP1-UCP3 (149,197). Although UCP4 and UCP5 may play an unconfirmed role in the neural system, their function for reducing oxidative stress is clear (195,198). Hoang et al (149) speculated that UCP4 acts in a neuroprotective role during early neuronal development, while UCP2 and UCP5 provided the protective function of restricting ROS production in developed neurons and other tissues, based on the observation that UCP2 and UCP5 displayed higher proton transport rates than UCP4. Oxidative stress has been proven to be involved in both neurodegenerative diseases and aging, so the UCP-dependent reduction of ROS in the nervous system has the potential to be neuroprotective in diseases such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (199,200). Certain evidence indicates that protein-protein interactions exist between UCP4 and CII: UCP4-overexpressing neuroblastoma cells increase ATP synthesis via increasing the succinate-induced respiration mediated by CII (201). Pfeiffer et al (202) demonstrated that the Caenorhabditis elegans UCP4 plays a novel role in the regulation of CII by controlling succinate transport into mitochondria. UCP4 was also deemed to regulate calcium homeostasis in neuronal cells (203).
UCPs and diseases
Regardless, as an inner mitochondrial membrane protein, UCP1 mainly plays a role in the maintenance of body temperature in a cold environment through non-shivering thermogenesis and UCP2-5 can protect cells from oxidative stress by reducing the mitochondrial membrane potential via mediating uncoupling. Due to their wide distribution, UCPs have different physiological significance in specific tissues. Therefore, abnormal changes in UCPs in each tissue will lead to tissue-specific diseases (Fig. 2).
Distribution of mitochondrial UCP1-5 and their related diseases. BAT, brown adipose tissue WAT, white adipose tissue T2DM, type II diabetes SCZ, schizophrenia AD, Alzheimer's disease PD, Parkinson's disease COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease UCP, uncoupling proteins.
The ubiquitous UCP2 is associated with a number of metabolic diseases, such as diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular disease and even cancer, which has created immense interest in exploring the relationship between UCP2 and these diseases. Since UCP2 can regulate fatty acid and lipid metabolism, a number of studies have confirmed that UCP2 overexpression is associated with diet-induced obesity (204-206). UCP2 is highly expressed in pancreatic β-cells and has a negative regulatory effect on insulin secretion. Robson-Doucette et al (207) in 2011 demonstrated that the overexpression of UCP2 could reduce the secretion of glucose-induced insulin and subsequently induce type II diabetes (T2DM). Moreover, UCP2 knockout mice exhibited hyperinsulinemia and hypo-glycaemia (208). Briefly, glucose is metabolized through the ETC to increase ATP production, which leads to the release of insulin and the production of ROS. Chronic elevated glucose status can lead to the excessive expression of UCP2 to reduce the overproduction of ROS, resulting in reduced ATP production, reduced insulin secretion and, eventually, progression to diabetes (209,210). Chronic inflammation, including atherosclerosis, hypertension, diabetic vasculopathy and ischemia-reperfusion injury, is accompanied by excessive ROS production, which means that UCP2 can play a protective role in these diseases by reducing oxidative stress. The signaling pathways, such as nuclear factor (NF)-κB and p53, that can lead to cellular senescence, inflammation, and irreversible vasoconstriction can be inhibited by reducing ROS production. A study showed that the protein levels of UCP2 were significantly higher in human tumor tissues from the head and neck, skin, prostate and pancreas (211). Although the role of UCP2 in tumors is intuitive, the regulatory effects of UCP2 on cellular glucose and lipid metabolism, as well as the regulation of cellular oxidative stress, may be related to the development of tumors. Several studies have confirmed that UCP2 overexpression provides protection for tumor cells and leads to chemoresistance (212-214).
UCP3 has been verified to be associated with exercise intolerance in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. COPD patients have exhibited impairment in the form of exercise intolerance, which was linked to increased levels of intramuscular lipid peroxidation products (114,215). Given the fiber-type-specific expression of UCP3, researchers have examined UCP3 levels in muscle biopsies from COPD patients and found that UCP3 content was reduced in COPD (216). It can be speculated that low muscle UCP3 levels contribute to impaired exercise tolerance in COPD patients based on the function of fatty acid anion transportation. In addition, a number of studies have demonstrated that the accumulation of lipid peroxide damage, resulting from decreased UCP3 in skeletal muscle, leads to excessive oxidative stress and is a crucial aspect in the development and progression of obesity and T2DM (191,217,218).
UCP4, UCP5, together with UCP2, are expressed in the nervous system and are implicated in several neurological disorders, such as schizophrenia (SCZ), Alzheimer's disease (AD), and Parkinson's disease (PD). Various studies link UCP2 with neurodegeneration and aging (123,124,219). The three UCPs exert neuroprotective effects mainly through the alleviation of oxidative stress. The results from selected single nucleotide polymorphism markers within the neuronal UCPs showed that UCP2 and UCP4 are important in the genetic etiology of SCZ (219). Surprisingly, despite the downregulation of UCP2 mRNA levels in SCZ patients, Gigante et al (220) found that there were no differences in UCP2 protein between patients and controls. Future studies will be necessary to clarify whether the mechanism of UCP2 is protective and opposes SCZ progression. Furthermore, in the brains of AD patients, the expression levels of UCP2, 4, and 5 were significantly reduced, which limited the activation of cytoprotective mechanisms to slow the progress of AD (124). UCP5 and, especially, UCP4 are linked to PD. UCP4 is regulated by the oxidized DJ-1 and partially via the NF-κB pathway and can protect against oxidative stress and stabilize Ca 2+ homeostasis in PD, as demonstrated by Ramsden et al (148) in 2012. Drugs that induce neuronal UCP expression might represent another effective strategy to ameliorate PD.
5. Concluding remarks and perspective
In conclusion, the ETC is the core component of mitochondria. The OXPHOS process in the ETC, coupled with the generation of ATP, also results in ROS production. As a double-edged sword, ROS can play a role in signaling pathways, but ROS overproduction can cause cellular damage. The ROS produced by CIII is not only released into the matrix but also released into the IMS. The ROS released into the IMS can be converted to H 2 O 2 in a reaction catalyzed by SOD1, and the H 2 O 2 may diffuse out of the mitochondria and play an important role in physiological and pathological pathways. Therefore, the artificial regulation of ROS at the CIII site (site III Qo ) may be of great significance. Although the precise mechanism of ROS production is still unclear, the use of specific ROS inhibitors to reduce the excessive production of ROS under pathological conditions has ameliorated oxidative stress-mediated diseases. UCP-mediated proton leak is a positive feedback mechanism for the protection of cells against oxidative stress due to the rapid production of ATP. The proper activation of UCPs can reduce the production of cellular ROS without causing a decrease in ATP however, when the expression of UCPs becomes too high or too low or the UCP genes are mutated, pathological effects that are involved in various diseases can occur. UCP1 mediates the inducible proton conductance that is responsible for non-shivering thermogenesis in BAT, a critical response to prolonged cold exposure. UCP2 is involved in a variety of diseases, such as diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular disease. In addition, UCP2, UCP4 and UCP5 play an important role in neuroprotection and are associated with neurological diseases such as SCZ, AD and PD. Drugs targeting UCP expression and activity might represent as an effective strategy to ameliorate these diseases. However, the detailed mechanisms of the role of UCPs and the regulation of UCP expression under normal and stressful situations warrant further exploration.
The present study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81571844).
Availability of data and materials
ZBY and LZ conceived the review and analyzed the relevant literature. RZZ and SJ collected and reviewed the literature related to the topic of this manuscript and drafted the main part of this manuscript. RZZ, LZ and ZBY critically revised the manuscript. RZZ and SJ produced the figures. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
It should be noted from the diagram below that ubiquinone (a hydrophobic carrier that resides within the membrane) receives electrons from several different electron carriers. Cytochrome c (a hydrophilic carrier found with in the intermembrane space) on the other hand only transfers electrons from III to IV. The driving force of the ETC is the fact that each electron carrier has a higher standard reduction potential than the one that it accepts electrons from. Standard reduction potential is a measure of the ability to accept or donate electrons. Oxygen has the highest (most positive) standard reduction potential which means that is is most likely to accept electrons from other carriers. That is precisely why it is found at the end of the ETC.
Steps of the Electron Transport Chain
These four complexes actively transfer electrons from an organic metabolite, such as glucose. When the metabolite breaks down, two electrons and a hydrogen ion are released and then picked up by the coenzyme NAD + to become NADH, releasing a hydrogen ion into the cytosol.
The NADH now has two electrons passing them onto a more mobile molecule, ubiquinone (Q), in the first protein complex (Complex I). Complex I, also known as NADH dehydrogenase, pumps four hydrogen ions from the matrix into the intermembrane space, establishing the proton gradient. In the next protein, Complex II or succinate dehydrogenase, another electron carrier and coenzyme, succinate is oxidized into fumarate, causing FAD (flavin-adenine dinucleotide) to be reduced to FADH2. The transport molecule, FADH2 is then reoxidized, donating electrons to Q (becoming QH2), while releasing another hydrogen ion into the cytosol. While Complex II does not directly contribute to the proton gradient, it serves as another source for electrons.
Complex III, or cytochrome c reductase, is where the Q cycle takes place. There is an interaction between Q and cytochromes, which are molecules composed of iron, to continue the transfer of electrons. During the Q cycle, the ubiquinol (QH2) previously produced donates electrons to ISP and cytochrome b becoming ubiquinone. ISP and cytochrome b are proteins that are located in the matrix that then transfers the electron it received from ubiquinol to cytochrome c1. Cytochrome c1 then transfers it to cytochrome c, which moves the electrons to the last complex. (Note: Unlike ubiquinone (Q), cytochrome c can only carry one electron at a time). Ubiquinone then gets reduced again to QH2, restarting the cycle. In the process, another hydrogen ion is released into the cytosol to further create the proton gradient.
The cytochromes then extend into Complex IV, or cytochrome c oxidase. Electrons are transferred one at a time into the complex from cytochrome c. The electrons, in addition to hydrogen and oxygen, then react to form water in an irreversible reaction. This is the last complex that translocates four protons across the membrane to create the proton gradient that develops ATP at the end.
As the proton gradient is established, F1F0 ATP synthase, sometimes referred to as Complex V, generates the ATP. The complex is composed of several subunits that bind to the protons released in prior reactions. As the protein rotates, protons are brought back into the mitochondrial matrix, allowing ADP to bind to free phosphate to produce ATP. For every full turn of the protein, three ATP is produced, concluding the electron transport chain.
1. Complex IV, also known as cytochrome oxidase, performs which reaction?
A. NADH + Q ↔ NAD + + QH2
B. NADH ↔ NAD + + 2H + + 2e –
C. 2 H + + 2 e + + ½ O2 → H2O + energy
D. 4 H + + 4 e – + O2 → 2 H2O
2. What component(s) is passed to the first complex in the electron transport chain?
A. NADH + H +
B. FADH +
D. Cytochrome c
3. Where is the higher concentration of protons while the electron transport chain is activated?
A. Phospholipid layer
B. Mitochondrial matrix
C. Intermembrane space
D. Cell membrane